In the intricate choreography of Indonesia’s airspace, where hundreds of aircraft cross archipelagic skies each hour, one truth remains constant: no system—no matter how advanced—can replace the human mind at the centre of decision. The sophistication of satellites, radars, and algorithms ultimately converges at one point of cognition: the air traffic controller (ATC).
While AirNav Indonesia continues its ambitious modernization—deploying ADS-B networks, digital towers, and performance-based navigation (PBN)—the real transformation is not technological. It is human. The nation’s air traffic management (ATM) ecosystem is undergoing a silent but profound shift: from procedural control to cognitive leadership.
This is not a question of upgrading equipment. It is a question of upgrading thought.
Globally, the aviation world has learned—often painfully—that accidents are rarely due to the failure of machines, but of systems of thinking. From Tenerife in 1977 to Uberlingen in 2002, from the 737 MAX to near-miss events in the United States, investigations have consistently pointed toward decision overload, communication breakdown, or the erosion of situational awareness.
In a world where automation, artificial intelligence (AI), and big data increasingly shape how we manage airspace, Indonesia stands at a crossroads: Will human judgment evolve fast enough to lead the machines we build?
I: The Human Core of Indonesia’s Sky
Indonesia’s air navigation system is one of the most complex in the Asia–Pacific region. Covering over 5.2 million square kilometres of airspace, divided into two Flight Information Regions (FIRs)—Jakarta and Makassar—its controllers manage an average of 14,000 aircraft movements per day. They work under high cognitive demand: unpredictable weather, dynamic traffic surges, overlapping civil–military coordination, and growing drone activities.
Amid this complexity, AirNav Indonesia serves as the nation’s cognitive backbone. It integrates technological systems (radars, satellites, communication networks), operational procedures, and human decision cycles into one interdependent organism. In the language of systems theory, this is a System of Systems (SoS)—a network of autonomous subsystems (ATC units, meteorology, cyber systems, airports) that must interoperate seamlessly to maintain national airspace integrity.
Yet, like all complex systems, the weakest link is often human coordination.
Controllers work within environments saturated by data, noise, and time pressure. Every instruction they give—an altitude change, a vector, a hold—represents a decision balancing safety, efficiency, and international compliance. This cognitive dance requires what psychologists call situation awareness (SA): the ability to perceive, comprehend, and project the status of dynamic elements around them. It is not just about “seeing” the radar picture—it is about understanding what it means and anticipating what will happen next.
Equally critical is decision-making competence (DM): the capacity to select the optimal course of action among multiple options, under uncertainty and stress. The fusion of SA and DM defines operational excellence in ATM.
However, as the system becomes more automated, human roles do not diminish—they transform. Controllers are no longer mere operators; they become cognitive integrators, synthesizing data from diverse sensors and AI tools into real-time judgments. This evolution mirrors global trends under FAA’s NextGen and Europe’s SESAR programs, both emphasizing the human–machine partnership at the centre of airspace modernization.
In Indonesia, this transition is both urgent and strategic. The success of AirNav’s 2045 modernization roadmap depends not only on system architecture, but also on what might be called cognitive architecture—how people think, learn, and decide inside the system.
II: The Cognitive Bottleneck
Technological innovation often outpaces human adaptation. In many sectors, automation has reached levels where systems operate faster than human comprehension. In air traffic management, this introduces what researchers term the cognitive bottleneck: the mismatch between data availability and decision capacity.
- Decision Overload in the Digital Era
The proliferation of data sources—ADS-B, satellite feeds, meteorological models, performance-based flight data—means controllers now face an environment richer in information but poorer in clarity. More screens, alerts, and tools do not always translate into better decisions; they can also induce cognitive fatigue and attention tunnelling.
In Indonesia’s busiest FIRs, the Jakarta and Makassar control centres, controllers may manage up to 30 simultaneous aircraft during peak hours. In these conditions, mental workload becomes the critical variable. A single lapse in prioritization—such as missing a climbing aircraft crossing a descending one—can have cascading effects across multiple sectors.
Addressing this requires a shift from procedural to cognitive training. Traditional ATC instruction focuses on rules, phraseology, and separation minima. Modern ATM, however, demands metacognitive skills—how to think about thinking. This includes error recognition, pattern anticipation, and adaptive decision-making under uncertainty.
Countries like the UK and Singapore have begun embedding cognitive analytics and neuroergonomic simulations into their training pipelines. These methods use real-time eye-tracking, EEG-based workload sensors, and scenario-based virtual reality to measure how awareness and judgment evolve in high-pressure environments. For Indonesia, integrating such science-based training into AirNav’s learning ecosystem could redefine its national competency framework.
- The Fragility of Situational Awareness
Situational awareness is not static; it degrades quickly when the environment changes faster than the human mind can process. In 2023, a joint study by BRIN and AirNav indicated that 80% of operational deviations stemmed from partial situational awareness—controllers missing contextual cues due to divided attention or excessive reliance on automation.
In the SoS framework, this represents a feedback lag between Level 1 systems (radar, sensors) and Level 3 (decision networks). In practical terms, when a controller’s mental model of traffic differs from the actual system state, errors propagate invisibly through communication and coordination.
To mitigate this, situational awareness must evolve from individual cognition to shared cognition. This means building collaborative decision-making environments (CDM) where controllers, pilots, and systems share a unified mental picture. The implementation of ATFM (Air Traffic Flow Management) in Jakarta and Bali FIRs is an encouraging start—it allows cross-sector visibility of air traffic flows. However, expanding this into a real-time national decision hub would institutionalize shared SA at the systemic level.
- The Human–Machine Paradox
Automation promises efficiency but can erode vigilance. When systems become too reliable, humans disengage—a phenomenon known as automation complacency. In aviation, this has been observed in both cockpits and control centers: operators lose touch with system dynamics until a failure demands sudden intervention, often beyond their situational readiness.
The paradox is clear: the more the system helps you, the less capable you become to help it when it fails.
The answer lies in Human–Machine Teaming (HMT)—an emerging discipline emphasizing collaborative cognition. In this model, machines assist decision-making without replacing it. AI serves as a co-pilot for thought, not a substitute for judgment. For instance, an AI-driven conflict detection system can flag potential separations, but the controller must still interpret and prioritize those alerts within context.
AirNav’s early initiatives in AI-based traffic flow modelling with BRIN mark the first step toward this paradigm. Yet, scaling it requires a cultural transformation: controllers must be trained not just to operate systems, but to collaborate with them.
- Leadership in the Cognitive Age
Beyond individual performance lies a deeper challenge: leadership in complex systems. In the traditional hierarchy, control centres depend on rigid chains of command. But complexity theory teaches us that adaptive systems thrive under distributed decision-making—where authority flows dynamically according to situational relevance.
This is where cognitive leadership becomes vital. A cognitive leader is not defined by rank, but by awareness—someone who perceives patterns before others do and orchestrates decisions across domains. In AirNav’s context, this means supervisors who can interpret AI recommendations, understand meteorological uncertainty, and guide teams through ambiguity.
The future of air navigation will belong to organizations that lead by cognition, not by command.
III: The Ten Super-Critical Issues and the Human Dimension
In systems as vast and interdependent as Indonesia’s air navigation network, challenges rarely appear in isolation. They are systemic—spanning technology, policy, and human performance. The “super-critical issues” facing AirNav Indonesia are not only technical bottlenecks; they are cognitive stress points where human judgment meets systemic complexity.
Each issue is both a risk and an opportunity to realign the country’s ATM modernization around human factors and decision competence.
- Integrating the Skies: The ATM–UTM Convergence Challenge
The exponential growth of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) in Indonesia’s airspace has introduced a new frontier: how to manage the coexistence of drones and traditional aircraft. From police surveillance drones to commercial logistics operations, low-altitude traffic is expanding faster than regulatory adaptation.
This integration is not merely technological—it is cognitive. Controllers accustomed to structured traffic corridors must now anticipate unpredictable trajectories, varying communication reliability, and the absence of pilot situational feedback.
The key competence here is spatial situational awareness. Controllers must mentally map a three-dimensional airspace shared by entities they cannot “see” in the conventional sense. Without a unified air picture, ATC’s decision-making load increases exponentially.
To mitigate this, Indonesia must accelerate the establishment of a Joint ATM–UTM Integration Centre, combining AirNav, BRIN, and Kemenhub expertise. Within such a framework, ATC should be trained in dynamic airspace reasoning—understanding drone flight intent through data analytics rather than radio communication. This marks the shift from procedural control to predictive cognition.
- Cybersecurity: The Cognitive Frontline of Digital Airspace
As AirNav digitizes its CNS/ATM infrastructure, the invisible battlefield of cyber threats expands. Controllers are not cybersecurity engineers, yet they are the first cognitive sensors in the detection chain.
When a radar feed freezes or data shifts abnormally, it is often the human eye—not the algorithm—that first senses inconsistency. This intuitive awareness forms the bedrock of cyber situational awareness (CSA).
Globally, organizations like EUROCONTROL and FAA’s Cybersecurity Centre of Excellence now treat ATCOs as active participants in cyber defence. Indonesia must adopt a similar mindset: building cyber literacy into every operational role.
Training should include simulated intrusion scenarios, anomaly detection, and cross-domain decision drills. AirNav’s partnership with the National Cyber and Crypto Agency (BSSN) can evolve from compliance to cognitive collaboration, where controllers, engineers, and analysts jointly interpret real-time threats.
Cybersecurity in aviation is no longer about firewalls—it is about awareness.
- Artificial Intelligence and the Ethics of Decision Support
AI’s promise in ATM is immense: predictive conflict detection, dynamic flow optimization, and voice recognition for routine communication. Yet, the deeper question is not whether AI can decide—but whether humans can understand its decisions.
The cognitive relationship between controller and AI must be one of augmented trust. This requires explainable algorithms—systems that reveal not just outcomes, but reasoning. Without interpretability, automation bias emerges humans defer to the machine even when it is wrong.
To prevent this, AI must be designed as a co-decision architecture: tools that enhance situational awareness, not override it. Controllers should receive AI-in-the-loop training, where they learn to question, verify, and adapt algorithmic recommendations.
Globally, the SESAR Human Performance Programme emphasizes “humans in command, machines in assistance.” Indonesia’s modernization should echo this ethos, ensuring that cognitive authority remains human-centred even in the age of automation.
- Human–Machine Teaming: Toward Symbiotic Operations
The future control tower will not be defined by its height, but by its bandwidth. Digital towers—already operational in Sweden, Singapore, and Australia—allow remote management of multiple airports through integrated camera and sensor systems.
In such environments, controllers no longer rely on direct visual cues; they rely on data interpretation. This transition transforms the nature of situational awareness—from perceptual to analytical.
For AirNav Indonesia, this demands neuroergonomic design—interfaces aligned with how the brain processes information. Displays should support attentional scanning, highlight anomalies visually, and reduce cognitive clutter. The system should adapt to the human, not force the human to adapt to it.
Equally important is fostering team cognition. Controllers, engineers, and AI modules must share a common decision logic—a collaborative mental model. AirNav’s leadership should reframe operations as Human–Machine Teams (HMT), where cognitive synchronization matters as much as procedural compliance.
- Climate & Environmental Protection–Resilient ATM Systems
No aviation future is sustainable without climate resilience. Under ICAO’s CORSIA, states must monitor and offset emissions from international flights. Yet, the role of air navigation service providers in carbon reduction is often underestimated.
Controllers directly influence fuel burn and CO₂ output through routing, sequencing, and holding patterns. Every mile saved in track optimization is a ton of carbon avoided.
Hence, eco-decision-making becomes a new dimension of ATC competence. AirNav Indonesia can embed environmental situational awareness into its operational philosophy—training controllers to consider environmental impact as part of their tactical decisions.
The development of a Green ATM Unit, aligned with Airport Carbon Accreditation and the Net Zero Carbon 2050 (NZC) roadmap, would institutionalize this responsibility. Real-time weather integration with BMKG and AI-based route optimization could enable “climate-smart ATC,” where sustainability and safety co-exist.
This is not environmentalism—it is operational intelligence.
- Regional Interoperability: The ASEAN–APAC Seamless Sky
Indonesia’s airspace does not exist in isolation. The ICAO APAC Seamless ATM Plan envisions an integrated regional network where aircraft can transition across FIRs without procedural discontinuity.
This goal hinges on shared situational awareness between nations. Controllers must not only understand their own airspace, but also anticipate flows from Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Australia.
Humanly, this requires cultural situational awareness: recognizing communication nuances, phraseology variations, and cross-border coordination dynamics. AirNav’s controllers must therefore be both technically and diplomatically literate—able to manage airspace and relationships simultaneously.
Creating a Regional ATFM–CDM Hub in Jakarta could position Indonesia as the cognitive anchor of ASEAN airspace integration. In this vision, decision-making becomes a regional competence, and AirNav a central node of collaborative foresight.
- Space-Based Navigation and the Expanding Cognitive Horizon
With the introduction of satellite-based surveillance systems (ADS-B Satellite, SBAS, SATCOM), the operational horizon of ATM expands vertically—into space.
Controllers must now interpret data from orbital constellations, where latency, coverage, and precision vary. This demands new cognitive models: how to reconcile space-based feeds with ground-based radars, how to assess accuracy in mixed data environments.
Such integration requires multi-layered awareness—simultaneous understanding of terrestrial, aerial, and orbital systems. AirNav’s collaboration with BRIN’s space research division offers an opportunity to train a new generation of controllers proficient in space–air integration, ensuring Indonesia’s sovereignty over its orbital information domain.
- Crisis and Contingency Management: Resilience Under Pressure
Indonesia’s geography exposes it to frequent disruptions: volcanic eruptions, tropical storms, and seismic events. Each crisis tests the resilience of the ATM network—not just its infrastructure, but its cognition.
Controllers often become the first responders in the national crisis chain, coordinating reroutes, closures, and emergency clearances. Their decision-making under uncertainty can determine the continuity of national air connectivity.
The current gap lies in the absence of a unified ATM Contingency Playbook integrating BMKG, BNPB, and AirNav data streams. Embedding crisis cognition training—focused on improvisation, stress management, and scenario anticipation—would transform controllers into adaptive crisis leaders.
Resilience is not built in systems; it is built in minds.
- Geopolitics of Airspace: Managing Sovereignty with Awareness
Airspace is both a technical and political construct. The FIR realignment discussions with Singapore and increasing activity in the Natuna and North Natuna Sea, underscore how air navigation intersects with national security and diplomacy.
Here, situational awareness extends beyond aircraft to include intent, jurisdiction, and geopolitical signalling. Controllers, though operationally neutral, play a strategic role in maintaining order and confidence within contested regions.
Developing geo-cognitive literacy—the ability to interpret air movements as geopolitical patterns—can elevate AirNav’s institutional maturity. This would complement TNI AU’s defense surveillance and reinforce Indonesia’s position in regional negotiations.
In this sense, ATC is not just a safety function—it is an instrument of sovereignty.
- Governance and the Human Capital Continuum
Finally, all technological and operational advances hinge on one enabling system: governance.
AirNav Indonesia’s long-term transformation requires not only investments in hardware but in human ware.
The current human capital challenge is twofold: uneven distribution of expertise across regions and limited cognitive development pathways. Many talented controllers plateau early, constrained by structural hierarchies and a lack of interdisciplinary exposure.
To address this, Indonesia must establish a National ATC Competency Framework aligned with ICAO’s Competency-Based Training and Assessment (CBTA). Beyond that, a Cognitive Development Pathway—incorporating neuroscience, AI literacy, and systems thinking—should define career progression.
AirNav’s vision must evolve from “training operators” to “developing cognitive leaders.”
Institutions like the Centre for Strategic and Aviation Studies (CSAS) could serve as the bridge—linking academic research, operational practice, and policy formulation. Through such integration, AirNav’s controllers will become not only skilled professionals but intellectual stewards of Indonesia’s sky.
The Human Thread Across All Systems
Across these ten super-critical issues, a pattern emerges: every technological challenge converges on a human one. The system’s resilience, efficiency, and sustainability all depend on cognitive adaptability.
In the System of Systems model, technology represents the hardware of safety, but humans provide its software of judgment.
Without adaptive cognition, even the most advanced network becomes brittle. But with empowered minds, even imperfect technology can achieve excellence.
IV: From Controllers to Cognitive Leaders
In the coming decade, Indonesia’s airspace will be governed not by the number of radars it owns but by the quality of cognition within its control rooms. The traditional notion of “air traffic controller” is giving way to a new archetype: the cognitive leader.
- The Evolution of Role and Identity
Historically, air traffic controllers were viewed as tactical executors—implementers of pre-defined procedures ensuring aircraft separation and orderly flow. Their expertise lay in adherence: following the rules with precision.
But in the era of complex systems, adherence is not enough. Controllers now operate at the intersection of automation, uncertainty, and system interdependence. They must make judgments where rules end and adaptation begins.
This evolution mirrors the transition seen in modern aviation management globally—from operator-centric models to adaptive expertise. The cognitive leader is not just compliant; they are anticipatory. They perceive emerging anomalies before they surface, integrating technical, environmental, and geopolitical dimensions into decision-making.
In the FAA’s NextGen and SESAR Human Performance Vision 2050, this shift is formalized: controllers are viewed as mission designers rather than procedural executors. They guide automated systems through insight, not instruction.
For AirNav Indonesia, embracing this paradigm means redefining leadership pipelines. Supervisors, managers, and directors must themselves become systems thinkers—individuals who understand how technology, policy, and psychology interconnect. Without this alignment, organizational inertia will limit modernization, no matter how advanced the infrastructure becomes.
- The Cognitive Leadership Framework
Cognitive leadership rests on three interlinked capacities:
- Perceptual Intelligence — the ability to extract meaningful signals from noisy, high-volume data streams; recognizing what matters before it matters.
- Collaborative Decision-Making (CDM) Intelligence — the capacity to synthesize perspectives across domains (engineering, meteorology, cyber, military) into unified, time-critical actions.
- Reflective Intelligence — the discipline to evaluate past decisions, institutionalize learning, and refine mental models continuously.
These attributes must be cultivated deliberately through neurocognitive training environments—simulators that replicate uncertainty, ambiguity, and time pressure. Traditional “checklist” training produces accuracy; cognitive training produces adaptability.
This distinction is vital. In the high-velocity world of air navigation, adaptability equals safety.
- Leadership Beyond the Tower
Cognitive leadership must also extend into policy and governance. AirNav’s directors and policymakers must practice strategic situational awareness—the ability to perceive systemic risks and opportunities before they crystallize.
For example, as drone corridors, satellite networks, and environmental regulations converge, leaders must anticipate regulatory intersections. They must align domestic modernization with global frameworks: ICAO’s Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP 2023–2038), CORSIA, and the Net Zero Carbon (NZC 2050) roadmap.
Leadership in this context means designing institutions that can think as dynamically as the systems they manage. This requires breaking silos—creating governance architectures where AirNav, BRIN, BMKG, BSSN, and TNI AU operate not as separate entities, but as interlocking minds within a national System of Systems (SoS).
Indonesia’s airspace, after all, is not only an operational domain—it is an ecosystem of intelligence.
V: Policy and Governance Pathways
To translate human-centric insight into structural transformation, Indonesia needs more than reforms—it needs a cognitive policy paradigm.
Below are five integrated policy directions forming a blueprint for a resilient, adaptive, and human-centred air navigation future.
- Establish a National Airspace Governance Blueprint
A National Airspace Governance Blueprint should serve as Indonesia’s long-term strategy for integrating technology, human capital, and policy.
This blueprint must articulate three commitments:
- Interoperability across technical systems (CNS/ATM, UTM, AI, cybersecurity).
- Cognitive integration across human systems (ATC, management, research, defense).
- Adaptive governance mechanisms for continuous learning.
Such a framework would align national modernization with the ICAO Global Air Navigation Plan, ensuring that every technological upgrade contributes to systemic resilience, not fragmentation.
- Institutionalize the Centre of Excellence for Cognitive ATM Systems
Indonesia urgently needs a dedicated research–training hub: a Centre of Excellence for Integrated ATM and Human Factors.
Jointly managed by AirNav Indonesia, BRIN, and the Ministry of Transportation, this centre would:
- Conduct neuroergonomic research to enhance decision performance.
- Develop AI-assisted decision-support interfaces tailored to Indonesian contexts.
- Serve as a regional knowledge hub for ASEAN’s Seamless ATM vision.
Through international partnerships—with SESAR, FAA, and ICAO—the centre could position Indonesia as Asia’s leader in Cognitive ATM Innovation.
- Redefine ATC Training through the Cognitive Competency Framework
AirNav’s training ecosystem must evolve from technical proficiency to cognitive mastery.
Adopt ICAO’s Competency-Based Training and Assessment (CBTA) model, expanded to include:
- Cognitive Simulation Modules — real-time scenario drills integrating AI and crisis events.
- SA–DM Metrics — measurable indicators of situational awareness and decision quality.
- Ethical AI Literacy — preparing controllers to interact with intelligent systems responsibly.
These curricula should be continuously updated through collaboration with universities, BRIN, and ICAO experts, ensuring Indonesian controllers operate at the frontiers of human–machine coordination.
- Embed Environmental Intelligence in ATM Operations
AirNav’s operational doctrine must embrace eco-efficiency as a cognitive principle.
Controllers influence emissions through every tactical vector and sequencing decision.
Embedding eco-decision-making in training, supported by AI-based eco-routing systems, would institutionalize AirNav’s alignment withCORSIA (Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation), Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACI), and Net Zero Carbon (NZC 2050) initiatives.
By integrating carbon monitoring and weather analytics into its decision systems, AirNav can redefine itself not just as a navigation provider but as a national environmental steward.
- Strengthen Adaptive Governance and Cross-Agency Collaboration
Finally, reform must extend to the governance layer.
Indonesia’s airspace oversight involves multiple entities—AirNav, Kemenhub, TNI AU, BMKG, BRIN, and BSSN—each with distinct mandates. Yet systemic safety and security demands adaptive collaboration.
A permanent National Airspace Council could institutionalize this cooperation, operating as a learning governance system: continuously reviewing, predicting, and adapting policy through shared data and cognitive modelling.
Such a body would ensure that modernization efforts remain coherent, accountable, and future-oriented—bridging the gap between operational insight and national strategy.
CLOSING VISION: Leadership in the Age of Cognitive Airspace
The future of Indonesia’s skies will not be decided by how many satellites it launches or how advanced its algorithms become. It will be decided by how well its people think.
In the coming decades, as AI grows more autonomous and airspace becomes more contested, the nation’s safety, sovereignty, and sustainability will hinge on human cognition as infrastructure.
Decision-making and situational awareness will be Indonesia’s most valuable assets—intangible yet irreplaceable.
AirNav Indonesia stands at the nexus of this transformation. Its controllers are no longer mere guardians of separation—they are architects of safety, sustainability, and trust.
Each instruction transmitted from a control tower embodies a cognitive synthesis of systems, knowledge, and humanity.
The modernization of air navigation must therefore evolve from technological transformation to cognitive evolution.
Machines may process data faster, but only humans can perceive meaning.
Systems may predict outcomes, but only humans can define purpose.
As the world moves toward increasingly automated skies, Indonesia must ensure that humans remain the pilots of the system, not its passengers.
By investing in cognitive leadership —by empowering its controllers to think with clarity, empathy, and foresight —Indonesia can build not just a modern ATM network, but a resilient, intelligent, and ethical airspace system worthy of its 21st-century aspirations.
Because in the end, the sky is not governed by technology—it is governed by thought.
References:
Airports Council International. (2023). Airport carbon accreditation programme: The global standard for carbon management in the airport industry. Geneva, Switzerland: Airports Council International (ACI). Retrieved from https://www.airportcarbonaccreditation.org/
Federal Aviation Administration. (2023). NextGen implementation plan: The future of air traffic management in the United States. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/nextgen
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2019). Carbon offsetting and reduction scheme for international aviation (CORSIA) implementation elements. Montréal, Canada: ICAO. Retrieved from https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/CORSIA/Pages/default.aspx
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2022). Asia and Pacific seamless air traffic management plan (Version 2.0). Bangkok, Thailand: ICAO Asia and Pacific Office. Retrieved from https://www.icao.int/APAC/Pages/seamless-atm.aspx
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2023). Global air navigation plan (GANP) 2023–2040 (Doc 9750, 7th ed.). Montréal, Canada: ICAO. Retrieved from https://www.icao.int/airnavigation/Pages/GANP-Resources.aspx
SESAR Joint Undertaking. (2021). European ATM master plan: Digitalising Europe’s sky. Brussels, Belgium: SESAR Joint Undertaking. Retrieved from https://www.sesarju.eu/masterplan
SESAR Joint Undertaking. (2024). Human performance in the digital European sky: Human factors and artificial intelligence integration. Brussels, Belgium: SESAR Joint Undertaking. Retrieved from https://www.sesarju.eu
